Our approach
Every plan this tool writes stands on frameworks with decades of classroom evidence behind them. No invented methodology, no buzzwords. Here is exactly what we use, and exactly where it shows up in your plan.
Understanding by Design (Wiggins & McTighe) says decide what mastery looks like before you plan a single activity. So the exit ticket is written first, before Engage, and every phase that follows is built toward it. Assessment is not bolted on at the end; it is the blueprint.
Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate: the experiential learning cycle (Kolb) wearing a lab coat. Explore comes before Explain, because students need the productive struggle before the formal vocabulary. Crawl, walk, run, in every phase.
Every item on your exit ticket and quiz carries a “Why this item” rationale: what it diagnoses and which facet of understanding it checks. Wrong answers are never random; each one maps to a known misconception, so the ticket tells you what to reteach, not just who missed it.
Retrieval practice over re-reading. One new idea at a time, because working memory is tiny (Sweller). Daily review, small steps, and a high success rate before independent work (Rosenshine). Students produce something in every phase; nobody just listens for fifteen minutes.
One primary standard drives every plan, at the rigor of the standard’s exact verb (Bloom’s, Webb’s DOK). Supporting standards appear where they fit naturally. One standard learned to mastery beats three toured.
Formative assessment research (Wiliam) puts the professional’s judgment at the center, and so do we. The tool offers versions, never verdicts. You pick what fits your room, rewrite anything with your own direction, and make every final call.
Where it shows up
Free for Bentonville science teachers.